Monday, December 17, 2012

Disillusionment, the NY Times, and Playing Victim

Get ready for a long read- first is a re-posting of an article with appeared in the NY Times- give it a read and then I'll have my angst response afterwards...

New York Times
December 16, 2012 - 12:42 PM
It hasn't been a good year for evangelicals. I should know. I'm one of them.

In 2012 we witnessed a collapse in American evangelicalism. The old religious right largely failed to affect the Republican primaries, much less the presidential election. Last month, Americans voted in favor of same-sex marriage in four states, while Florida voters rejected an amendment to restrict abortion.

Much has been said about conservative Christians and their need to retool politically. But that is a smaller story, riding on the back of a larger reality: Evangelicalism as we knew it in the 20th century is disintegrating.

In 2011 the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life polled church leaders from around the world. Evangelical ministers from the United States reported a greater loss of influence than church leaders from any other country -- with some 82 percent indicating that their movement was losing ground.

I grew up hearing tales of my grandfather, a pastor, praying with President Ronald Reagan at the White House. My father, also a pastor, prayed with George W. Bush in 2000. I now minister to my own congregation, which has grown to about 500, a tenfold increase, in the last four years (by God's favor and grace, I believe). But, like most young evangelical ministers, I am less concerned with politics than with the exodus of my generation from the church.

Studies from established evangelical polling organizations -- LifeWay Research, an affiliate of the Southern Baptist Convention, and the Barna Group -- have found that a majority of young people raised as evangelicals are quitting church, and often the faith, entirely.

As a contemporary of this generation (I'm 30), I embarked three years ago on a project to document the health of evangelical Christianity in the United States. I did this research not only as an insider, but also as a former investigative journalist for an alt weekly.

I found that the structural supports of evangelicalism are quivering as a result of ground-shaking changes in American culture. Strategies that served evangelicals well just 15 years ago are now self-destructive. The more that evangelicals attempt to correct course, the more they splinter their movement. In coming years we will see the old evangelicalism whimper and wane.

First, evangelicals, while still perceived as a majority, have become a shrinking minority in the United States. In the 1980s heyday of the Rev. Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority, some estimates accounted evangelicals as a third or even close to half of the population, but research by the Notre Dame sociologist Christian Smith recently found that Christians who call themselves evangelicals account for just 7 percent of Americans. (Other research has reported that some 25 percent of Americans belong to evangelical denominations, though they may not, in fact, consider themselves evangelicals.)

Smith's findings are derived from a three-year national study of evangelical identity and influence, financed by the Pew Research Center. They suggest that American evangelicals now number around 20 million, about the population of New York state. The global outlook is more optimistic, as evangelical congregations flourish in places like China, Brazil and sub-Saharan Africa.

But while America's population grows by roughly 2 million a year, attendance across evangelical churches -- from the Southern Baptists to Assemblies of God and nondenominational churches -- has gradually declined, according to surveys of more than 200,000 congregations by the American Church Research Project.

The movement also faces a donation crisis as older evangelicals, who give a disproportionately large share, age. Unless younger evangelicals radically increase their giving, the movement will be further strained.

Evangelicals have not adapted well to rapid shifts in the culture -- including, notably, the move toward support for same-sex marriage. The result is that evangelicals are increasingly typecast as angry and repressed bigots. In 2007, the Institute for Jewish and Community Research, in a survey of 1,300 college professors, found that 3 percent held "unfavorable feelings" toward Jews, 22 percent toward Muslims and 53 percent toward evangelical Christians.

To be sure, college professors are not representative of the population, and, despite national trends of decline, evangelicals have many exceptional ministries. Most metropolitan areas in the U.S. have at least one thriving megachurch. In New York City, Redeemer Presbyterian and the Brooklyn Tabernacle pack multiple services every weekend. A handful of other churches, like North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Ga., and Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., see more than 20,000 worshipers each weekend. Savvy ministers like the Rev. Craig Groeschel, founder of, are using new technologies to deliver the "good news."

The pulse of evangelicalism is also shifting, in many ways for the good, from U.S. politics to aid for the global poor, as evidenced in books by the Rev. David Platt, the Rev. Max Lucado and the Rev. Timothy Keller. Evangelicals are still a sophisticated lot, with billions in assets, millions of adherents and a constellation of congregations, radio stations, universities and international aid groups. But all this machinery distracts from the historical vital signs of evangelicalism: to make converts and point to Jesus Christ. By those measures this former juggernaut is coasting, at best, if not stalled or in reverse.

How can evangelicalism right itself? I don't believe it can -- at least, not back to the politically muscular force it was as recently as 2004, when white evangelicals gave President George W. Bush his narrow re-election. Evangelicals can, however, use the economic, social and spiritual crises facing America to refashion themselves into a more sensitive, spiritual and humble movement.

We evangelicals must accept that our beliefs are now in conflict with the mainstream culture. We cannot change ancient doctrines to adapt to the currents of the day. But we can, and must, adapt the way we hold our beliefs -- with grace and humility instead of superior hostility.

The core evangelical belief is that love and forgiveness are freely available to all who trust in Jesus Christ. This is the "good news" from which the evangelical name originates ("euangelion" is a Greek word meaning "glad tidings" or "good news"). Instead of offering hope, many evangelicals have claimed the role of moral gatekeeper, judge and jury. If we continue in that posture, we will continue to invite opposition and obscure the "good news" we are called to proclaim.

I believe the cultural backlash against evangelical Christianity has less to do with our views -- many observant Muslims and Jews, for example, also view homosexual sex as wrong, while Catholics have been at the vanguard of the movement to protect the lives of the unborn -- and more to do with our posture. The Scripture calls us "aliens and exiles" (1 Peter 2:11), but American evangelicals have not acted with the humility and homesickness of aliens. The proper response to our sexualized and hedonistic culture is not to chastise, but to "conduct yourselves honorably among the Gentiles, so that, though they malign you as evildoers, they may see your good deeds and glorify God" (1 Peter 2:12).

This does not mean we whitewash unpopular doctrines like the belief that we are all sinners but that we re-emphasize the free forgiveness available to all who believe in Jesus Christ.

Some evangelical leaders are embarrassed by our movement's present paralysis. I am not. Weakness is a potent purifier. As Paul wrote, "I am content with weaknesses ... for the sake of Christ" (2 Corinthians 12:10). For me, the deterioration and disarray of the movement is a source of hope: hope that churches will stop angling for human power and start proclaiming the power of Christ.

Simple faith in Christ's sacrifice will march on, unchallenged by empires and eras. As the English writer G.K. Chesterton put it, "Christianity has died many times and risen again; for it had a God who knew the way out of the grave."


John S. Dickerson is the senior pastor of Cornerstone Church and author of the forthcoming book "The Great Evangelical Recession: Six Factors That Will Crash the American Church ... and How to Prepare."
and now my response:
a couple of comments from a younger Christian and pastor (please take them as constructive criticism): First off, I highly recommend the Barna Institute book You Lost Me- which directly tackles (with high quality research) most of the ire and disillusionment you seem to be voicing. Secondly- it seems like you are only blaming younger Christians, which I think is not only unfair but also hypocritical. Many, including myself are convinced that the traditional evangelical church we grew up in not only failed us with the real world we grew up in, but continues to fail to even understand the language of the issues at hand. The older church has fallen out of the modern story because it no longer speaks the language of the culture it is apart of. Next, what do you mean exactly by the term 'losing'? Is this a game? The last time Christians had complete control of government we had people burned alive at the stake as heretics and witches; the inquisition and the crusades. Im not saying Christians should not have a voice in their governments- actually, we all serve as a political counterweight. Democracy, anciently, is designed produce wizened compromise out of two radically differing opinions. Continuing on, your comments about how young people dont tithe to their churches- a couple of things: one, churches still have this cultural assumption that if you only open your doors people morally ought to come. Look around. Do you see this as true any more?? Also, I am highly offended, because young people give their time- everywhere- to so many Godly projects which dont count rote amounts to holiness. Tell me, which does God value more? The number of dollars given, or the heart of the person giving what they have? In a similar vein, your article appears to equate high church attendance with success... Continuing on, are older Christians just now figuring out about new technologies?? If given a list of 'new technologies', would you really list items like 'TV' and 'Radio'... REALLY? What about Ipads and swatches, Twitter and links and aps? What, did those not make your list? Your article also appears to assume that the encouragement of intelligent thought is at odds with the Great Commission. Since when was God too small to handle hard questions? Your article seems to also assume the equation of political muscle with electing favorable (only?) Republican candidates. Ultimately, I feel your portrayal of older Christians as societal victims as well as an air of injured self-righteousness seems to fit the modern stereotypes rather well. Where was the listening ear when young people needed it? Where was the understanding when we hit hard times? Where was Jesus when you closed your church doors for service?

Like what you read? Join in with your own insights, stories and art- send them to Thanks and God bless -Ryan

1 comment:

  1. angsty yet thought provoking and as I see it deserving accurate response. The church needs honest examination, because its alienating the same people that grew up inside it.